CRMG vs. CCUP
CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and CCUP (T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CCUP.
Performance
CRMG vs. CCUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -57.62% return, which is significantly lower than CCUP's -38.71% return.
CRMG
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -57.62%
- 6M
- -56.45%
- 1Y
- -62.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCUP
- 1D
- -21.76%
- 1M
- -60.42%
- YTD
- -38.71%
- 6M
- -49.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG vs. CCUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -57.62% | 19.88% |
CCUP T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF | -38.71% | -83.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMG and CCUP is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMG vs. CCUP — Risk / Return Rank
CRMG
CCUP
CRMG vs. CCUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRMG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRMG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.47 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
CRMG vs. CCUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, smaller than the maximum CCUP drawdown of -93.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and CCUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.38% | -93.74% | +19.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.99% | -89.90% | +20.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.92% | -69.36% | +31.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.28% | — | — |
Volatility
CRMG vs. CCUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.38% | 198.09% | -122.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.55% | 198.09% | -122.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.55% | 198.09% | -122.54% |
CRMG vs. CCUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CCUP's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMG vs. CCUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRMG nor CCUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMG and CCUP have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CCUP.
CRMG and CCUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 1.50% for CCUP.
Find the right allocation for CRMG and CCUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer