CRMG vs. CCUP
CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and CCUP (T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CCUP.
Performance
CRMG vs. CCUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -65.13% return, which is significantly higher than CCUP's -69.12% return.
CRMG
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 18.32%
- 6M
- -51.86%
- YTD
- -65.13%
- 1Y
- -67.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCUP
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -49.05%
- 6M
- -67.94%
- YTD
- -69.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG vs. CCUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -65.13% | 11.88% |
CCUP T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF | -69.12% | -82.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMG and CCUP is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMG vs. CCUP — Risk / Return Rank
CRMG
CCUP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG vs. CCUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRMG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRMG vs. CCUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -79.83%, smaller than the maximum CCUP drawdown of -94.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and CCUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.83% | -94.91% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.49% | -94.91% | +20.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | -71.80% | +30.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.60% | — | — |
Volatility
CRMG vs. CCUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.99% | 194.15% | -116.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.67% | 194.15% | -118.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.67% | 194.15% | -118.48% |
CRMG vs. CCUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CCUP's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMG vs. CCUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRMG nor CCUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMG and CCUP have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CCUP.
CRMG and CCUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 1.50% for CCUP.
Find the right allocation for CRMG and CCUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer