CRMEX vs. FTHMX
CRMEX (CRM All Cap Value Fund) and FTHMX (FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, CRMEX returned 39.53% vs 27.99% for FTHMX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRMEX charges 1.34%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for FTHMX.
Performance
CRMEX vs. FTHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRMEX achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than FTHMX's 14.83% return.
CRMEX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 18.57%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
FTHMX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMEX vs. FTHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMEX CRM All Cap Value Fund | 16.69% | 11.04% | 15.55% | 11.94% |
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 14.83% | 12.89% | 12.48% | 11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMEX and FTHMX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CRMEX and FTHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMEX vs. FTHMX — Risk / Return Rank
CRMEX
FTHMX
CRMEX vs. FTHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM All Cap Value Fund (CRMEX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRMEX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 4.69 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.54 | 16.43 | -3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRMEX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.35 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.31 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
CRMEX vs. FTHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMEX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, which is greater than FTHMX's maximum drawdown of -20.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMEX and FTHMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMEX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -20.45% | -33.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -6.33% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -3.04% | -6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 1.80% | +1.54% |
Volatility
CRMEX vs. FTHMX - Volatility Comparison
CRM All Cap Value Fund (CRMEX) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX) at 3.45%. This indicates that CRMEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMEX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 3.45% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | 9.36% | +5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.33% | 12.65% | +6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 15.43% | +4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 15.43% | +5.14% |
CRMEX vs. FTHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMEX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHMX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMEX vs. FTHMX - Dividend Comparison
CRMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than FTHMX's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMEX CRM All Cap Value Fund | 8.13% | 9.49% | 11.02% | 1.92% | 7.25% | 22.91% | 2.70% | 6.13% | 26.31% | 16.83% | 4.64% | 29.97% |
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.28% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMEX and FTHMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRMEX has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to FTHMX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMEX dropped -53.72% vs FTHMX's -20.45%.
FTHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRMEX and FTHMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer