PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMAX vs. FMCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMAX vs. FMCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (CRMAX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMAX achieves a 18.80% return, which is significantly higher than FMCSX's 17.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CRMAX has underperformed FMCSX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while FMCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


CRMAX

1D
2.92%
1M
9.96%
YTD
18.80%
6M
18.25%
1Y
37.66%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
11.15%

FMCSX

1D
1.64%
1M
3.81%
YTD
17.37%
6M
18.71%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMAX vs. FMCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRMAX
CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
18.80%3.89%16.52%8.77%-10.82%26.46%13.02%25.69%-7.84%13.97%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
17.37%11.80%14.55%11.02%-6.40%28.64%11.43%25.39%-6.67%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMAX and FMCSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2004

0.93

The correlation between CRMAX and FMCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMAX vs. FMCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMAX
CRMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CRMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FMCSX
FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMAX vs. FMCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (CRMAX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMAXFMCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.83

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

14.86

-4.03

CRMAX vs. FMCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the FMCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMAX and FMCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMAXFMCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.10

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.59

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.69

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.58

-0.10

Drawdowns

CRMAX vs. FMCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMAX drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, smaller than the maximum FMCSX drawdown of -62.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMAX and FMCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMAXFMCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.36%

-62.19%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-8.55%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.73%

-22.33%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.73%

-22.33%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.56%

-40.55%

-1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-9.35%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

2.20%

+1.44%

Volatility

CRMAX vs. FMCSX - Volatility Comparison

CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (CRMAX) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) at 5.04%. This indicates that CRMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMAXFMCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

5.04%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.55%

12.28%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

15.58%

+3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.09%

17.72%

+2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

18.60%

+2.14%

CRMAX vs. FMCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCSX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMAX vs. FMCSX - Dividend Comparison

CRMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than FMCSX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRMAX
CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
4.40%5.23%15.07%0.64%6.41%35.31%5.86%2.68%18.13%29.30%2.13%12.11%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
1.56%1.83%8.94%2.60%5.44%12.80%6.72%6.63%18.48%6.66%8.25%14.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRMAX and FMCSX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRMAX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to FMCSX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMAX dropped -49.36% vs FMCSX's -62.19%.

FMCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMAX and FMCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer