CRIMX vs. FTHMX
CRIMX (CRM Mid Cap Value Fund) and FTHMX (FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, CRIMX returned 28.64% vs 27.99% for FTHMX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRIMX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for FTHMX.
Performance
CRIMX vs. FTHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRIMX achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly lower than FTHMX's 14.83% return.
CRIMX
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 28.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
FTHMX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRIMX vs. FTHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRIMX CRM Mid Cap Value Fund | 12.52% | 9.15% | 8.84% | 12.29% |
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 14.83% | 12.89% | 12.48% | 11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRIMX and FTHMX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between CRIMX and FTHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRIMX vs. FTHMX — Risk / Return Rank
CRIMX
FTHMX
CRIMX vs. FTHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM Mid Cap Value Fund (CRIMX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRIMX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 2.35 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.55 | 3.40 | -0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.41 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 4.69 | -2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | 16.43 | -7.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRIMX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.35 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.31 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
CRIMX vs. FTHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRIMX drawdown since its inception was -49.69%, which is greater than FTHMX's maximum drawdown of -20.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRIMX and FTHMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRIMX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.69% | -20.45% | -29.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.35% | -6.33% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -3.04% | -4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 1.80% | +1.62% |
Volatility
CRIMX vs. FTHMX - Volatility Comparison
CRM Mid Cap Value Fund (CRIMX) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX) at 3.45%. This indicates that CRIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRIMX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 3.45% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.65% | 9.36% | +4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 12.65% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 15.43% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 15.43% | +3.62% |
CRIMX vs. FTHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRIMX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHMX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRIMX vs. FTHMX - Dividend Comparison
CRIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than FTHMX's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRIMX CRM Mid Cap Value Fund | 5.28% | 5.94% | 9.75% | 6.25% | 4.33% | 19.21% | 2.03% | 3.01% | 10.26% | 20.06% | 4.13% | 40.25% |
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.28% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRIMX and FTHMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRIMX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to FTHMX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRIMX dropped -49.69% vs FTHMX's -20.45%.
FTHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRIMX and FTHMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer