CRHG.L vs. XCOU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRHG.L (iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and XCOU.L (Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) are both Global Corporate Bonds funds - CRHG.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP while XCOU.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CRHG.L returned 5.32%/yr vs 2.79%/yr for XCOU.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRHG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XCOU.L.

Performance

CRHG.L vs. XCOU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) and Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CRHG.L is traded in GBP, while XCOU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XCOU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRHG.L achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than XCOU.L's 1.19% return.

CRHG.L

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 5.32%
• 5Y*: 0.40%
• 10Y*: —

XCOU.L

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 2.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRHG.L vs. XCOU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRHG.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)	0.72%	5.84%	3.84%	7.67%	-5.45%
XCOU.L Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc	1.19%	-2.22%	6.24%	3.05%	-0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CRHG.L and XCOU.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022	0.08

Return for Risk

CRHG.L vs. XCOU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRHG.L

CRHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
CRHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CRHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CRHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
CRHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CRHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

XCOU.L

XCOU.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
XCOU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
XCOU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
XCOU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
XCOU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XCOU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRHG.L vs. XCOU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) and Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRHG.L	XCOU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	0.70	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	1.05	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.13	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	0.83	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.67	2.00	+3.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRHG.L vs. XCOU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the XCOU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRHG.L and XCOU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRHG.L	XCOU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	0.70	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.22	+0.10

Drawdowns

CRHG.L vs. XCOU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRHG.L drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, which is greater than XCOU.L's maximum drawdown of -15.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRHG.L and XCOU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRHG.L	XCOU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.54%	-15.77%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.71%	-5.44%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.31%	-8.50%	+4.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-3.62%	+2.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.53%	-6.82%	+1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	2.25%	-1.41%

Volatility

CRHG.L vs. XCOU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) is 1.45%, while Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) has a volatility of 1.83%. This indicates that CRHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCOU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRHG.L	XCOU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.45%	1.83%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.18%	4.97%	-1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.08%	6.38%	-2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.68%	8.49%	-2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.74%	8.49%	-2.75%

CRHG.L vs. XCOU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRHG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XCOU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CRHG.L vs. XCOU.L - Dividend Comparison

CRHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while XCOU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CRHG.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)	4.09%	4.01%	3.76%	3.18%	2.70%	2.02%	2.27%	2.66%	1.27%
XCOU.L Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRHG.L and XCOU.L in my portfolio?

CRHG.L and XCOU.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRHG.L or XCOU.L?

On fees, XCOU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRHG.L or XCOU.L?

XCOU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CRHG.L.

What is the main difference between CRHG.L and XCOU.L?

CRHG.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while XCOU.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CRHG.L and 0.15% for XCOU.L.