CRF vs. ECC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Cornerstone, while ECC (Eagle Point Credit Company Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CRF returned 10.59%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for ECC. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CRF vs. ECC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRF achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly higher than ECC's -23.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CRF has outperformed ECC with an annualized return of 10.59%, while ECC has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.

CRF

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 1.22%
• 6M: -1.21%
• YTD: -0.77%
• 1Y: 10.66%
• 3Y*: 13.59%
• 5Y*: 8.82%
• 10Y*: 10.59%
• ALL TIME*: 5.05%

ECC

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 0.79%
• 6M: -16.68%
• YTD: -23.10%
• 1Y: -27.26%
• 3Y*: -11.15%
• 5Y*: -4.96%
• 10Y*: 1.68%
• ALL TIME*: 2.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	$7.26M	$8.16M	$8.33M
ECC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc	$2.81M	$3.28M	$3.82M

CRF vs. ECC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	-0.77%	12.46%	44.39%	19.49%	-36.70%	39.73%	28.13%	21.74%	-11.74%	21.35%
ECC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc	-23.10%	-18.45%	11.77%	12.11%	-11.71%	56.78%	-21.00%	18.80%	-13.72%	27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CRF and ECC is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014	0.24

Return for Risk

CRF vs. ECC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRF

CRF Risk / Return Rank: 16
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 15

ECC

ECC Risk / Return Rank: 16
ECC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ECC Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ECC Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ECC Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
ECC Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRF vs. ECC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRF	ECC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	-0.80	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	-1.02	+2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.88	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	-0.60	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.29	-0.95	+3.25

CRF vs. ECC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the ECC Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRF and ECC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRF vs. ECC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRF drawdown since its inception was -80.70%, which is greater than ECC's maximum drawdown of -70.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRF and ECC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRF	ECC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.70%	-70.79%	-9.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-45.79%	+30.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.66%	-49.65%	+19.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.12%	-49.65%	+6.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.90%	-70.79%	+24.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.60%	-41.68%	+39.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.24%	-13.32%	-8.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.66%	28.63%	-23.97%

Volatility

CRF vs. ECC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) is 3.40%, while Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that CRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRF	ECC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	5.92%	-2.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.90%	25.33%	-11.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.35%	34.34%	-18.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	24.36%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.88%	36.43%	-10.55%

Dividends

CRF vs. ECC - Dividend Comparison

CRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.79%, less than ECC's 35.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	19.79%	17.38%	14.32%	19.94%	29.31%	13.41%	18.91%	21.67%	24.85%	17.96%	24.08%	23.58%
ECC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc	35.51%	29.17%	20.05%	19.58%	23.42%	11.71%	13.08%	16.43%	16.89%	13.02%	14.36%	14.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRF and ECC in my portfolio?

CRF and ECC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRF or ECC?

ECC has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to CRF (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRF dropped -80.70% vs ECC's -70.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.