CRF vs. CLMT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (CLMT).

CRF is managed by Cornerstone. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990.

Performance

CRF vs. CLMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (CLMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRF vs. CLMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	-8.05%	12.46%	20.46%
CLMT Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.	74.08%	-9.76%	29.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRF achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly lower than CLMT's 74.08% return.

CRF

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: -8.05%
• 6M: -4.88%
• 1Y: 19.18%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 5.92%
• 10Y*: 11.40%

CLMT

• 1D: -3.65%
• 1M: 26.19%
• YTD: 74.08%
• 6M: 87.79%
• 1Y: 171.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRF vs. CLMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRF

CRF Risk / Return Rank: 50
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

CLMT

CLMT Risk / Return Rank: 95
CLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRF vs. CLMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (CLMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRF	CLMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	3.25	-2.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	3.31	-1.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.49	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	5.46	-4.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.90	18.93	-14.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRF vs. CLMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the CLMT Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRF and CLMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRF	CLMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	3.25	-2.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.82	-0.77

Correlation

The correlation between CRF and CLMT is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRF vs. CLMT - Dividend Comparison

CRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.94%, while CLMT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	19.94%	17.38%	14.32%	19.94%	29.31%	13.41%	18.91%	21.67%	24.85%	17.96%	24.08%	23.58%
CLMT Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRF vs. CLMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRF drawdown since its inception was -80.70%, which is greater than CLMT's maximum drawdown of -61.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRF and CLMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRF	CLMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.70%	-61.87%	-18.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-31.63%	+16.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.74%	-3.65%	-6.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.39%	-21.91%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	9.13%	-5.05%

Volatility

CRF vs. CLMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) is 7.96%, while Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (CLMT) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that CRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRF	CLMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.96%	14.12%	-6.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.73%	27.92%	-15.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.15%	53.11%	-32.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.82%	63.06%	-37.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.86%	63.06%	-37.20%