CRED vs. URE
CRED (Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF) and URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) are both REIT funds - CRED tracks the Beta Advantage Lionstone Research Enhanced REIT Index - Benchmark TR Gross while URE tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CRED returned 8.84%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for URE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CRED charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for URE.
Performance
CRED vs. URE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRED achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 13.97% return.
CRED
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 12.65%
- 1Y
- 8.89%
- 3Y*
- 8.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- -4.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
CRED vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRED Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF | 12.18% | -2.30% | 5.21% | 13.18% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 13.97% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 18.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRED and URE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between CRED and URE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
CRED vs. URE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CRED
URE
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
CRED
URE
Financial Services
CRED
URE
Basic Materials
CRED
-
URE
Communication Services
CRED
-
URE
-
Consumer Cyclical
CRED
-
URE
-
Consumer Defensive
CRED
-
URE
-
Energy
CRED
-
URE
-
Healthcare
CRED
-
URE
-
Industrials
CRED
-
URE
-
Technology
CRED
-
URE
-
Utilities
CRED
-
URE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRED vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank
CRED
URE
CRED vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRED | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.07 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 0.50 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 1.20 | +1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRED | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.31 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | -0.06 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
CRED vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRED drawdown since its inception was -17.59%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRED and URE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRED | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.59% | -97.16% | +79.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -16.50% | +8.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.59% | -33.77% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -52.68% | +50.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -64.52% | +58.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 6.83% | -3.15% |
Volatility
CRED vs. URE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) is 3.76%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that CRED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRED | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 7.56% | -3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 19.29% | -9.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 26.73% | -14.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 37.28% | -21.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 40.53% | -24.29% |
CRED vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRED has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than URE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRED vs. URE - Dividend Comparison
CRED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than URE's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRED Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF | 4.54% | 5.50% | 4.82% | 2.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 2.05% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CRED and URE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
URE has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to CRED (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRED dropped -17.59% vs URE's -97.16%.
On 3-year performance, URE leads with 8.96% vs 8.84% for CRED. On fees, CRED is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CRED has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, URE has performed better with a 8.96% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRED is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.
CRED has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.05% for URE.
CRED tracks Beta Advantage Lionstone Research Enhanced REIT Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Columbia and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CRED and 0.95% for URE.
CRED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRED and URE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer