CRED.TO vs. CCCX.TO
CRED.TO (CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund) and CCCX.TO (CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRED.TO is a Investment Grade Bonds fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management, while CCCX.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management. Both are actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRED.TO charges 1.94%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CCCX.TO.
Performance
CRED.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRED.TO achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly higher than CCCX.TO's -31.77% return.
CRED.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.25%
CCCX.TO
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 8.53%
- 6M
- -30.24%
- YTD
- -31.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$484.00 | CA$315.52 | CA$5.52K | |
| CA$47.86K | CA$36.58K | CA$31.94K |
CRED.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRED.TO CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund | 1.05% | 1.29% |
CCCX.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF | -31.77% | -25.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRED.TO and CCCX.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRED.TO vs. CCCX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CRED.TO
CCCX.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRED.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund (CRED.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRED.TO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRED.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRED.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, smaller than the maximum CCCX.TO drawdown of -58.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRED.TO and CCCX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRED.TO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.05% | -58.93% | +48.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -53.38% | +53.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -36.18% | +34.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility
CRED.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRED.TO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86% | 52.24% | -50.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.69% | 52.24% | -49.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.44% | 52.24% | -48.80% |
CRED.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRED.TO has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than CCCX.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRED.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Dividend Comparison
CRED.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while CCCX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCCX.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRED.TO CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.95% | 3.13% | 3.21% | 3.01% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRED.TO and CCCX.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCCX.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCCX.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for CRED.TO.
CRED.TO is categorized as Investment Grade Bonds, while CCCX.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for CRED.TO and 0.50% for CCCX.TO.
Find the right allocation for CRED.TO and CCCX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer