CRDU vs. CRMG
CRDU (Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. CRDU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
CRDU vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDU achieves a 84.50% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -67.91% return.
CRDU
- 1D
- -5.35%
- 1M
- -14.28%
- 6M
- 71.40%
- YTD
- 84.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- 6M
- -66.41%
- YTD
- -67.91%
- 1Y
- -69.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRDU vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRDU Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF | 84.50% | -39.80% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -67.91% | 12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDU and CRMG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDU vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
CRDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
CRDU vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF (CRDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRDU | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRDU vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDU drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDU and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDU | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -79.83% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -75.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.18% | -76.52% | +44.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.53% | -40.61% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 44.54% | — |
Volatility
CRDU vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDU | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 64.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.30% | 77.21% | +110.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.30% | 75.38% | +111.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 187.30% | 75.38% | +111.92% |
CRDU vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRDU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRDU vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRDU nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDU and CRMG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CRDU.
CRDU and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CRDU and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for CRDU and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer