CRDU vs. BOEG
CRDU (Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF) and BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRDU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BOEG.
Performance
CRDU vs. BOEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDU achieves a 84.50% return, which is significantly higher than BOEG's -6.85% return.
CRDU
- 1D
- -5.35%
- 1M
- -14.28%
- 6M
- 71.40%
- YTD
- 84.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOEG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- -19.65%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- -21.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRDU vs. BOEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRDU Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF | 84.50% | -39.80% |
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF | -6.85% | -5.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDU and BOEG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDU vs. BOEG — Risk / Return Rank
CRDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BOEG
CRDU vs. BOEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF (CRDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRDU | BOEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.99 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRDU vs. BOEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDU drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, which is greater than BOEG's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDU and BOEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDU | BOEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -46.47% | -38.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -46.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.18% | -30.06% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.53% | -20.02% | -22.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.37% | — |
Volatility
CRDU vs. BOEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDU | BOEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 47.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.30% | 63.71% | +123.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.30% | 63.88% | +123.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 187.30% | 63.88% | +123.42% |
CRDU vs. BOEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRDU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BOEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRDU vs. BOEG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRDU nor BOEG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDU and BOEG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BOEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BOEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CRDU.
CRDU and BOEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CRDU and 0.75% for BOEG.
Find the right allocation for CRDU and BOEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer