CRDU vs. BMNG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRDU (Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRDU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.

Performance

CRDU vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF (CRDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDU achieves a 48.08% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -72.19% return.

CRDU

• 1D: 3.12%
• 1M: 16.22%
• YTD: 48.08%
• 6M: -9.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNG

• 1D: 11.82%
• 1M: -43.79%
• YTD: -72.19%
• 6M: -85.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDU vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRDU Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF	48.08%	-25.50%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-72.19%	-81.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDU and BMNG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

CRDU vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF (CRDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRDU	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	-0.52	+0.43

Drawdowns

CRDU vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDU drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDU and BMNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRDU	BMNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.72%	-95.36%	+10.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.88%	-94.82%	+71.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.59%	-81.47%	+35.88%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRDU	BMNG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	182.89%	191.69%	-8.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	182.89%	191.69%	-8.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	182.89%	191.69%	-8.80%

CRDU vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRDU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRDU vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRDU nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRDU and BMNG in my portfolio?

CRDU and BMNG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRDU or BMNG?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRDU or BMNG?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CRDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRDU or BMNG?

CRDU and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CRDU and BMNG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CRDU and 0.75% for BMNG.