CRDU vs. BMNG
CRDU (Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRDU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.
Performance
CRDU vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDU achieves a 84.50% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -82.31% return.
CRDU
- 1D
- -5.35%
- 1M
- -14.28%
- 6M
- 71.40%
- YTD
- 84.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNG
- 1D
- 3.88%
- 1M
- -22.57%
- 6M
- -85.04%
- YTD
- -82.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRDU vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRDU Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF | 84.50% | -26.26% |
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -82.31% | -80.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDU and BMNG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDU vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF (CRDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRDU vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDU drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -97.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDU and BMNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDU | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -97.32% | +12.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.18% | -96.70% | +64.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.53% | -83.05% | +40.52% |
Volatility
CRDU vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDU | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.30% | 186.37% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.30% | 186.37% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 187.30% | 186.37% | +0.93% |
CRDU vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRDU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRDU vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRDU nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDU and BMNG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CRDU.
CRDU and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CRDU and 0.75% for BMNG.
Find the right allocation for CRDU and BMNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer