CRDSX vs. SWSBX
CRDSX (Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund) and SWSBX (Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, CRDSX returned 4.86%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for SWSBX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRDSX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SWSBX.
Performance
CRDSX vs. SWSBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDSX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than SWSBX's 0.34% return.
CRDSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWSBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- —
CRDSX vs. SWSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDSX Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund | 0.78% | 5.51% | 4.81% | 5.02% | -2.53% |
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 0.34% | 6.06% | 3.42% | 3.95% | -4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDSX and SWSBX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CRDSX and SWSBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDSX vs. SWSBX — Risk / Return Rank
CRDSX
SWSBX
CRDSX vs. SWSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (CRDSX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRDSX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.34 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 2.37 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.95 | 7.75 | +9.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRDSX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 1.64 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.77 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
CRDSX vs. SWSBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDSX drawdown since its inception was -4.22%, smaller than the maximum SWSBX drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDSX and SWSBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDSX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -9.06% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.92% | -1.54% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.92% | -1.79% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.63% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -1.79% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 0.47% | -0.23% |
Volatility
CRDSX vs. SWSBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (CRDSX) is 0.45%, while Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that CRDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDSX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | 0.70% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.06% | 1.62% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48% | 2.23% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.04% | 2.99% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.04% | 2.47% | -0.43% |
CRDSX vs. SWSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRDSX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSBX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRDSX vs. SWSBX - Dividend Comparison
CRDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than SWSBX's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDSX Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund | 4.25% | 4.32% | 4.38% | 3.50% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 4.13% | 4.09% | 3.66% | 2.36% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 1.82% | 2.41% | 2.12% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDSX and SWSBX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWSBX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to CRDSX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDSX dropped -4.22% vs SWSBX's -9.06%.
CRDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRDSX and SWSBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer