PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRCO vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRCO vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (CRCO) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCO achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly higher than PEPS's 11.10% return.


CRCO

1D
-9.80%
1M
-19.84%
YTD
13.15%
6M
8.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PEPS

1D
0.39%
1M
5.83%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.19%
1Y
32.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRCO vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRCO
YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF
13.15%-36.94%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
11.10%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CRCO and PEPS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRCO vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRCO

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRCO vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (CRCO) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRCO vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRCOPEPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

1.06

-1.52

Drawdowns

CRCO vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCO drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than PEPS's maximum drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCO and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCOPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.75%

-21.26%

-40.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.38%

-0.13%

-36.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.18%

-2.76%

-30.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

Volatility

CRCO vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCOPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.65%

13.05%

+73.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.65%

18.28%

+68.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.65%

18.28%

+68.37%

CRCO vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRCO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRCO vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

CRCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.91%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CRCO
YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF
89.91%35.79%0.00%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.88%1.00%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRCO and PEPS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for CRCO.

CRCO has the higher dividend yield at 89.91%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for CRCO and 0.10% for PEPS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRCO and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer