CRCA vs. MULL
CRCA (ProShares Ultra CRCL) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRCA charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
CRCA vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCA achieves a -25.37% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.
CRCA
- 1D
- -20.86%
- 1M
- -48.25%
- YTD
- -25.37%
- 6M
- -39.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCA vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCA ProShares Ultra CRCL | -25.37% | -81.81% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 423.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCA and MULL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCA vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
CRCA
MULL
CRCA vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra CRCL (CRCA) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRCA | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 46.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 7.45 | -7.92 |
Drawdowns
CRCA vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCA drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCA and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCA | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.02% | -72.29% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.98% | 0.00% | -87.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.26% | -20.62% | -48.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.79% | — |
Volatility
CRCA vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCA | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 105.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 196.79% | 132.38% | +64.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 196.79% | 136.22% | +60.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 196.79% | 136.22% | +60.57% |
CRCA vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCA vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
CRCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRCA ProShares Ultra CRCL | 2.32% | 1.06% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCA and MULL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRCA is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRCA is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
CRCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CRCA and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for CRCA and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer