PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRBN vs. DJIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRBN vs. DJIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRBN vs. DJIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
-2.35%21.85%19.29%22.31%-10.68%
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
-1.83%9.11%14.52%9.15%-2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRBN achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than DJIA's -1.83% return.


CRBN

1D
1.04%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
-2.35%
6M
0.26%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
11.60%

DJIA

1D
0.38%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
3.58%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRBN vs. DJIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DJIA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CRBN vs. DJIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRBN
CRBN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DJIA
DJIA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DJIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJIA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DJIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJIA Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRBN vs. DJIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRBNDJIADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

0.52

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

0.83

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.15

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

0.75

+1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.87

3.05

+4.82

CRBN vs. DJIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRBN Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the DJIA Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRBN and DJIA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRBNDJIADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.52

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.59

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between CRBN and DJIA is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CRBN vs. DJIA - Dividend Comparison

CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than DJIA's 11.42% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
2.26%2.21%1.94%2.01%1.95%1.57%1.41%2.27%2.51%2.05%2.27%2.01%
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
11.42%10.60%11.44%7.16%9.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CRBN vs. DJIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, which is greater than DJIA's maximum drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and DJIA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRBNDJIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-16.91%

-16.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-9.20%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.41%

-5.23%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-3.63%

-1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.25%

+0.35%

Volatility

CRBN vs. DJIA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) at 4.12%. This indicates that CRBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRBNDJIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

4.12%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

6.08%

+4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

13.05%

+4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

11.32%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.87%

11.32%

+5.55%