CRAZX vs. QDSNX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CRAZX (Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund) and QDSNX (AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, CRAZX returned 5.66%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for QDSNX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRAZX charges 0.74%/yr vs 3.30%/yr for QDSNX.

Performance

CRAZX vs. QDSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund (CRAZX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRAZX achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than QDSNX's 4.94% return.

CRAZX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 19.33%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 7.10%

QDSNX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 4.94%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 13.29%
• 3Y*: 12.45%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRAZX vs. QDSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CRAZX Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund	9.07%	14.35%	7.85%	8.84%	-15.03%	11.20%	11.29%
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N	4.94%	16.14%	9.56%	8.62%	14.48%	10.35%	5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CRAZX and QDSNX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020	0.20

Over the past year, CRAZX and QDSNX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CRAZX vs. QDSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRAZX

CRAZX Risk / Return Rank: 80
CRAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CRAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
CRAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CRAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
CRAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

QDSNX

QDSNX Risk / Return Rank: 88
QDSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QDSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QDSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QDSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QDSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRAZX vs. QDSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund (CRAZX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRAZX	QDSNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.54	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.77	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.48	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	6.57	-2.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.96	17.91	-1.95

CRAZX vs. QDSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRAZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the QDSNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRAZX and QDSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRAZX vs. QDSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRAZX drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, which is greater than QDSNX's maximum drawdown of -7.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRAZX and QDSNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRAZX	QDSNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.21%	-7.15%	-11.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.16%	-1.97%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.82%	-6.93%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.21%	-7.15%	-11.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-1.35%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-1.45%	-2.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.20%	0.72%	+0.48%

Volatility

CRAZX vs. QDSNX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund (CRAZX) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) at 1.77%. This indicates that CRAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRAZX	QDSNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	1.77%	+1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.55%	3.62%	+2.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.11%	5.08%	+3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.75%	7.61%	+1.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.33%	7.29%	+1.04%

CRAZX vs. QDSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRAZX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than QDSNX's 3.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRAZX vs. QDSNX - Dividend Comparison

CRAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than QDSNX's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRAZX Columbia Adaptive Risk Allocation Fund	2.63%	2.87%	2.52%	0.55%	8.14%	20.39%	2.12%	7.51%	6.22%	7.14%	0.94%	1.03%
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N	1.90%	1.99%	0.00%	11.18%	8.01%	5.99%	1.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRAZX and QDSNX in my portfolio?

CRAZX and QDSNX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRAZX or QDSNX?

CRAZX has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to QDSNX (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRAZX dropped -18.21% vs QDSNX's -7.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.