CRAK vs. TMLPX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX).
CRAK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Oil Refiners. It was launched on Aug 18, 2015. TMLPX is managed by Transamerica. It was launched on Apr 29, 2013.
Performance
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 31.71% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 13.73% | 19.10% | 10.90% | -11.22% | 9.15% | -10.46% | 49.86% |
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 22.91% | 3.87% | 38.51% | 5.07% | 9.12% | 23.54% | -11.25% | 15.66% | -15.29% | -0.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRAK achieves a 31.71% return, which is significantly higher than TMLPX's 22.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CRAK has outperformed TMLPX with an annualized return of 12.53%, while TMLPX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.05% annualized return.
CRAK
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 10.12%
- YTD
- 31.71%
- 6M
- 37.36%
- 1Y
- 75.35%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
TMLPX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 22.91%
- 6M
- 21.45%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRAK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TMLPX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CRAK vs. TMLPX — Risk / Return Rank
CRAK
TMLPX
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRAK | TMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.63 | 1.18 | +2.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.38 | 1.53 | +2.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.24 | +0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 1.41 | +3.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.23 | 4.02 | +17.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRAK | TMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.63 | 1.18 | +2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 1.05 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.51 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.24 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRAK and TMLPX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Dividend Comparison
CRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than TMLPX's 3.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.53% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 3.68% | 4.33% | 3.71% | 7.34% | 4.83% | 4.33% | 6.09% | 5.65% | 6.10% | 5.51% | 3.95% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRAK drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, smaller than the maximum TMLPX drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRAK and TMLPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRAK | TMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.80% | -67.18% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -14.74% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -16.60% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.80% | -55.61% | -3.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.75% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.64% | -22.87% | +10.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 5.17% | -1.68% |
Volatility
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) at 4.12%. This indicates that CRAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRAK | TMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 4.12% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 9.35% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.89% | 17.80% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 17.03% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 21.79% | +0.31% |