CRAK vs. TMLPX
CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) and TMLPX (Transamerica Energy Infrastructure) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CRAK returned 12.77%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for TMLPX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRAK charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for TMLPX.
Performance
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CRAK having a 20.86% return and TMLPX slightly higher at 21.06%. Over the past 10 years, CRAK has outperformed TMLPX with an annualized return of 12.77%, while TMLPX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.41% annualized return.
CRAK
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 20.73%
- 1Y
- 42.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
TMLPX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 21.06%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- 1Y
- 24.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.79%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 20.86% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 13.73% | 19.10% | 10.90% | -11.22% | 9.15% | -10.46% | 49.86% |
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 21.06% | 3.87% | 38.51% | 5.07% | 9.12% | 23.54% | -11.25% | 15.66% | -15.29% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRAK and TMLPX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CRAK and TMLPX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRAK vs. TMLPX — Risk / Return Rank
CRAK
TMLPX
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRAK | TMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 3.28 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.53 | 8.55 | +2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRAK drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, smaller than the maximum TMLPX drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRAK and TMLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRAK | TMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.80% | -67.18% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.84% | -7.12% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.61% | -16.60% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -16.60% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.80% | -55.61% | -3.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.74% | -5.59% | -7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.47% | -22.51% | +10.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.73% | +0.93% |
Volatility
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) at 5.19%. This indicates that CRAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRAK | TMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 5.19% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | 10.77% | +4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.11% | 14.06% | +5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 17.20% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 21.80% | +0.37% |
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRAK has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than TMLPX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRAK vs. TMLPX - Dividend Comparison
CRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than TMLPX's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.67% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 2.84% | 4.33% | 3.71% | 7.34% | 4.83% | 4.33% | 6.09% | 5.65% | 6.10% | 5.51% | 3.95% | 5.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRAK and TMLPX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRAK has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to TMLPX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRAK dropped -58.80% vs TMLPX's -67.18%.
CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRAK and TMLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer