CRAIX vs. QDIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about CCM Community Impact Bond Fund (CRAIX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX).
CRAIX is managed by Community Capital Management. It was launched on Aug 30, 1999. QDIBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019.
Performance
CRAIX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRAIX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAIX CCM Community Impact Bond Fund | -0.01% | 6.40% | 1.97% | 3.98% | -10.19% | -1.72% | 3.99% | -0.10% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | -0.22% | 7.72% | 1.66% | 6.71% | -14.11% | -0.17% | 6.77% | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRAIX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly higher than QDIBX's -0.22% return.
CRAIX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.04%
QDIBX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRAIX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRAIX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CRAIX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank
CRAIX
QDIBX
CRAIX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCM Community Impact Bond Fund (CRAIX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRAIX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.03 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 1.51 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.00 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 5.89 | +0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRAIX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.03 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.07 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.16 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRAIX and QDIBX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CRAIX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison
CRAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than QDIBX's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAIX CCM Community Impact Bond Fund | 2.79% | 3.01% | 2.92% | 2.48% | 1.61% | 1.18% | 1.77% | 2.32% | 2.30% | 2.78% | 2.28% | 2.12% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.51% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.65% | 2.51% | 1.80% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CRAIX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRAIX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum QDIBX drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRAIX and QDIBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRAIX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -19.63% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | -2.58% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.28% | -19.63% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -1.98% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -6.52% | +4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.87% | -0.18% |
Volatility
CRAIX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CCM Community Impact Bond Fund (CRAIX) is 1.22%, while Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that CRAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRAIX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 1.51% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.98% | 2.54% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.27% | 4.32% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 6.58% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 6.32% | -2.69% |