CQQQ vs. USOY
CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) and USOY (Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CQQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the AlphaShares China Technology Index, while USOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. CQQQ is passively managed, while USOY is actively managed. Over the past year, CQQQ returned 32.76% vs 57.29% for USOY. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CQQQ charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for USOY.
Performance
CQQQ vs. USOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.
CQQQ
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- -7.50%
- 10Y*
- 5.40%
USOY
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- 62.18%
- 6M
- 59.35%
- 1Y
- 57.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CQQQ vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.46% | 34.96% | 10.54% |
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF | 62.18% | -7.93% | 7.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQQQ and USOY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024 | -0.05 |
The correlation between CQQQ and USOY shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQQQ vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank
CQQQ
USOY
CQQQ vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CQQQ | USOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 4.03 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.16 | 7.74 | -4.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CQQQ | USOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.89 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.99 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
CQQQ vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and USOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQQQ | USOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.99% | -17.46% | -56.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.41% | -14.29% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.18% | -5.11% | -44.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.29% | -6.47% | -21.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.39% | 7.42% | +2.97% |
Volatility
CQQQ vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) have volatilities of 11.60% and 11.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQQQ | USOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 11.62% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.88% | 27.18% | -5.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.78% | 30.44% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.02% | 26.13% | +11.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.30% | 26.13% | +7.17% |
CQQQ vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
CQQQ vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison
CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.11% | 2.17% | 0.28% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.41% | 1.69% | 1.77% |
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF | 54.16% | 104.32% | 48.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CQQQ and USOY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to CQQQ (11.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQQQ dropped -73.99% vs USOY's -17.46%.
On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 57.29% vs 32.76% for CQQQ. On fees, CQQQ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 57.29% return vs 32.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CQQQ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.
USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 2.11% for CQQQ.
CQQQ is categorized as China Equities, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 1.22% for USOY.
USOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CQQQ and USOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer