CQQQ vs. KTEC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both China Equities funds - CQQQ tracks the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index while KTEC tracks the Hang Seng Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CQQQ returned -8.12%/yr vs -11.24%/yr for KTEC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CQQQ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.

Performance

CQQQ vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -16.16% return.

CQQQ

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -8.85%
• YTD: -1.35%
• 6M: -0.24%
• 1Y: 21.23%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: -8.12%
• 10Y*: 5.36%

KTEC

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -11.70%
• YTD: -16.16%
• 6M: -17.79%
• 1Y: -16.98%
• 3Y*: 3.50%
• 5Y*: -11.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQQQ vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	-1.35%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-22.52%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-16.16%	21.01%	16.13%	-10.41%	-26.12%	-29.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CQQQ and KTEC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021	0.91

The correlation between CQQQ and KTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

CQQQ vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CQQQ	KTEC
Technology	58.2%	21.3%
Communication Services	21.9%	27.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.8%	48.6%
Industrials	1.3%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CQQQ vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQQQ vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CQQQ	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	-0.61	+1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	-0.75	+1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.92	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	-0.56	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.01	-1.00	+3.01

CQQQ vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQQQ and KTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than KTEC's maximum drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and KTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQQQ	KTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.99%	-66.90%	-7.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.41%	-30.47%	+6.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.93%	-34.71%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.96%	-66.90%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.07%	-47.09%	-3.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.32%	-43.95%	+15.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.60%	16.97%	-6.37%

Volatility

CQQQ vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) at 9.07%. This indicates that CQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CQQQ	KTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.63%	9.07%	+1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.55%	20.61%	+1.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.20%	28.01%	+2.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.09%	43.16%	-5.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.33%	43.11%	-9.78%

CQQQ vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

CQQQ vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than KTEC's 4.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.20%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.00%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CQQQ and KTEC in my portfolio?

CQQQ and KTEC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CQQQ or KTEC?

CQQQ has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to KTEC (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQQQ dropped -73.99% vs KTEC's -66.90%.

Which ETF is better, CQQQ or KTEC?

On 5-year performance, CQQQ leads with -8.12% vs -11.24% for KTEC. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KTEC has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CQQQ or KTEC?

Over the 5-year period, CQQQ has performed better with a -8.12% return vs -11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CQQQ or KTEC?

KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CQQQ or KTEC?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 2.20% for CQQQ.

What is the main difference between CQQQ and KTEC?

CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index, while KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 0.69% for KTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.