CQQQ vs. GOOGL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index, while GOOGL (Alphabet Inc. Class A) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ returned 5.12%/yr vs 25.89%/yr for GOOGL. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CQQQ vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a -2.77% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 16.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ has underperformed GOOGL with an annualized return of 5.12%, while GOOGL has yielded a comparatively higher 25.89% annualized return.

CQQQ

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -5.74%
• YTD: -2.77%
• 6M: -3.14%
• 1Y: 20.91%
• 3Y*: 8.58%
• 5Y*: -8.26%
• 10Y*: 5.12%

GOOGL

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -9.30%
• YTD: 16.22%
• 6M: 15.96%
• 1Y: 110.03%
• 3Y*: 44.20%
• 5Y*: 24.94%
• 10Y*: 25.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQQQ vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	-2.77%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-24.54%	57.33%	33.57%	-34.77%	74.31%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A	16.22%	65.99%	36.01%	58.32%	-39.09%	65.30%	30.85%	28.18%	-0.80%	32.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CQQQ and GOOGL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2009	0.45

The correlation between CQQQ and GOOGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CQQQ vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 19

GOOGL

GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 96
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQQQ vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CQQQ	GOOGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	3.78	-3.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	5.10	-3.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.61	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	5.43	-4.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.00	19.79	-17.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CQQQ vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQQQ and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CQQQ	GOOGL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	3.78	-3.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.22	0.80	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.89	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.84	-0.66

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than GOOGL's maximum drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and GOOGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQQQ	GOOGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.99%	-65.29%	-8.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.41%	-20.37%	-4.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.93%	-29.81%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.96%	-44.32%	-22.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.99%	-44.32%	-29.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.77%	-9.71%	-42.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.31%	-13.02%	-15.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.48%	5.58%	+4.90%

Volatility

CQQQ vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) at 8.68%. This indicates that CQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CQQQ	GOOGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.83%	8.68%	+3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.45%	20.90%	+1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.22%	29.33%	+0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.08%	31.33%	+6.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.34%	29.13%	+4.21%

Dividends

CQQQ vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than GOOGL's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.23%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A	0.29%	0.27%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CQQQ and GOOGL in my portfolio?

CQQQ and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CQQQ or GOOGL?

CQQQ has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to GOOGL (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQQQ dropped -73.99% vs GOOGL's -65.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.