CQQQ vs. DRAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) and DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) are both China Equities funds. CQQQ is passively managed, while DRAG is actively managed. CQQQ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for DRAG.

Performance

CQQQ vs. DRAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CQQQ

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: 4.43%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 32.76%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: -7.50%
• 10Y*: 5.40%

DRAG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQQQ vs. DRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	-0.97%
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%

CQQQ vs. DRAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CQQQ	DRAG
Technology	58.2%	10.2%
Communication Services	21.9%	17.3%
Consumer Cyclical	13.8%	72.4%
Industrials	1.3%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CQQQ vs. DRAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 28
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQQQ vs. DRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CQQQ	DRAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.16	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CQQQ	DRAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	—	—

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. DRAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than DRAG's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and DRAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQQQ	DRAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.99%	0.00%	-73.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.18%	0.00%	-49.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.29%	0.00%	-28.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.39%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CQQQ	DRAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.78%	0.00%	+29.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.02%	0.00%	+38.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.30%	0.00%	+33.30%

CQQQ vs. DRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

CQQQ vs. DRAG - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while DRAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.11%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CQQQ or DRAG?

On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CQQQ or DRAG?

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CQQQ or DRAG?

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.00% for DRAG.

What is the main difference between CQQQ and DRAG?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 0.59% for DRAG.