CPXR vs. 4COP.DE
CPXR (USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF) and 4COP.DE (Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Copper funds - CPXR tracks the SummerHaven Copper Index while 4COP.DE tracks the Solactive Global Copper Miners v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CPXR returned 14.65% vs 82.65% for 4COP.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPXR charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for 4COP.DE.
Performance
CPXR vs. 4COP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CPXR is traded in USD, while 4COP.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 4COP.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPXR achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than 4COP.DE's 4.57% return.
CPXR
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -13.49%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- 14.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
4COP.DE
- 1D
- -4.37%
- 1M
- -11.81%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- 82.65%
- 3Y*
- 30.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPXR vs. 4COP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF | 2.23% | 35.65% |
4COP.DE Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 4.57% | 85.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPXR and 4COP.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CPXR and 4COP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPXR vs. 4COP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CPXR
4COP.DE
CPXR vs. 4COP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPXR | 4COP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.30 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 2.98 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 8.72 | -8.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPXR vs. 4COP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPXR drawdown since its inception was -47.87%, which is greater than 4COP.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXR and 4COP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPXR | 4COP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.87% | -42.24% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.87% | -27.70% | -20.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.22% | -21.01% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -15.36% | -4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.05% | 9.48% | +16.57% |
Volatility
CPXR vs. 4COP.DE - Volatility Comparison
USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) has a higher volatility of 18.23% compared to Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) at 16.20%. This indicates that CPXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4COP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPXR | 4COP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.23% | 16.20% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.72% | 37.10% | +9.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.92% | 43.02% | +26.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.43% | 35.92% | +32.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.43% | 35.92% | +32.51% |
CPXR vs. 4COP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPXR has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 4COP.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPXR vs. 4COP.DE - Dividend Comparison
CPXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while 4COP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
4COP.DE Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF | 0.69% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPXR and 4COP.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4COP.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4COP.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for CPXR.
CPXR tracks SummerHaven Copper Index, while 4COP.DE tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for CPXR and 0.55% for 4COP.DE.
Find the right allocation for CPXR and 4COP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer