PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPXR vs. 3SIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPXR vs. 3SIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged (3SIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPXR achieves a 21.61% return, which is significantly higher than 3SIL.L's -58.71% return.


CPXR

1D
-5.10%
1M
21.98%
YTD
21.61%
6M
34.31%
1Y
37.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3SIL.L

1D
-10.10%
1M
-17.79%
YTD
-58.71%
6M
-38.25%
1Y
137.92%
3Y*
46.56%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*
-1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXR vs. 3SIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CPXR
USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF
21.61%36.03%
3SIL.L
WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged
-58.71%561.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CPXR and 3SIL.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPXR vs. 3SIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPXR
CPXR Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CPXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

3SIL.L
3SIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
3SIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXR vs. 3SIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged (3SIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPXR3SIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.53

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

2.81

-1.34

CPXR vs. 3SIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXR Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the 3SIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXR and 3SIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPXR3SIL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.79

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

-0.22

+0.88

Drawdowns

CPXR vs. 3SIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXR drawdown since its inception was -47.87%, smaller than the maximum 3SIL.L drawdown of -99.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXR and 3SIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPXR3SIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.87%

-99.33%

+51.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.87%

-89.36%

+41.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.10%

-96.02%

+90.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-94.34%

+74.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.94%

48.91%

-22.97%

Volatility

CPXR vs. 3SIL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) is 18.75%, while WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged (3SIL.L) has a volatility of 56.78%. This indicates that CPXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3SIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPXR3SIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.75%

56.78%

-38.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.26%

179.73%

-134.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.77%

174.29%

-105.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.61%

109.81%

-41.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.61%

95.47%

-26.86%

CPXR vs. 3SIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXR has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 3SIL.L's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPXR vs. 3SIL.L - Dividend Comparison

CPXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while 3SIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPXR and 3SIL.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3SIL.L is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3SIL.L is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for CPXR.

CPXR is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while 3SIL.L is Silver. CPXR tracks SummerHaven Copper Index, while 3SIL.L tracks Solactive Silver Commodity Futures SL Index (3x). They also come from different issuers: USCF and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for CPXR and 0.99% for 3SIL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPXR and 3SIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer