PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3SIL.L vs. 3GLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3SIL.L vs. 3GLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged (3SIL.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold ETP Securities (3GLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3SIL.L vs. 3GLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3SIL.L
WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged
-47.87%692.77%16.75%-30.27%18.16%
3GLE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold ETP Securities
15.57%188.93%67.78%16.46%-12.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3SIL.L achieves a -47.87% return, which is significantly lower than 3GLE.L's 15.57% return.


3SIL.L

1D
7.19%
1M
-42.14%
YTD
-47.87%
6M
30.77%
1Y
171.11%
3Y*
53.28%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
3.42%

3GLE.L

1D
9.74%
1M
-30.66%
YTD
15.57%
6M
45.19%
1Y
115.26%
3Y*
76.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3SIL.L vs. 3GLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3SIL.L has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than 3GLE.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

3SIL.L vs. 3GLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3SIL.L
3SIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
3SIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

3GLE.L
3GLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
3GLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
3GLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3SIL.L vs. 3GLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged (3SIL.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold ETP Securities (3GLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3SIL.L3GLE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

1.43

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

1.88

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.36

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.80

7.39

-2.59

3SIL.L vs. 3GLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3SIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the 3GLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3SIL.L and 3GLE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3SIL.L3GLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.43

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

1.08

-1.29

Correlation

The correlation between 3SIL.L and 3GLE.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

3SIL.L vs. 3GLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3SIL.L nor 3GLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3SIL.L vs. 3GLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3SIL.L drawdown since its inception was -99.33%, which is greater than 3GLE.L's maximum drawdown of -49.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3SIL.L and 3GLE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3SIL.L3GLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.33%

-49.48%

-49.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.36%

-49.48%

-39.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.97%

-35.02%

-59.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.33%

-11.76%

-82.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.90%

15.79%

+19.11%

Volatility

3SIL.L vs. 3GLE.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged (3SIL.L) has a higher volatility of 58.12% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold ETP Securities (3GLE.L) at 35.01%. This indicates that 3SIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3GLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3SIL.L3GLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

58.12%

35.01%

+23.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

172.58%

72.70%

+99.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

165.59%

80.37%

+85.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.06%

53.39%

+52.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.41%

53.39%

+40.02%