CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CPXJ.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) and PAXG.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CPXJ.L returned 4.86%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for PAXG.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CPXJ.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PAXG.L.

Performance

CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CPXJ.L is traded in USD, while PAXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with CPXJ.L at 8.57% and PAXG.L at 8.57%.

CPXJ.L

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -0.61%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 10.28%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 13.47%
• 5Y*: 4.86%
• 10Y*: 7.73%

PAXG.L

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 6.77%
• 1Y: 12.62%
• 3Y*: 8.78%
• 5Y*: 0.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPXJ.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc	8.57%	20.05%	5.35%	5.87%	-5.98%	4.27%	6.80%	18.07%	-10.71%	26.08%
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS	8.57%	16.83%	-0.21%	2.59%	-10.69%	-1.18%	4.58%	8.02%	-6.39%	14.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CPXJ.L and PAXG.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2016	0.46

Over the past year, CPXJ.L and PAXG.L have become more correlated (0.91) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CPXJ.L	PAXG.L
Financial Services	45.5%	46.1%
Basic Materials	15.5%	14.6%
Industrials	8.6%	8.5%
Real Estate	7.9%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	6.0%
Utilities	3.6%	3.6%
Healthcare	3.2%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	3.0%
Communication Services	2.9%	2.7%
Energy	2.8%	2.9%
Technology	1.1%	1.1%

Return for Risk

CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPXJ.L

CPXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
CPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CPXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CPXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CPXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
CPXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

PAXG.L

PAXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PAXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PAXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PAXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PAXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPXJ.L	PAXG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	0.94	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.44	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.17	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	1.39	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.93	3.96	+1.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXJ.L and PAXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPXJ.L	PAXG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	0.94	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.06	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.32	+0.01

Drawdowns

CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than PAXG.L's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXJ.L and PAXG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPXJ.L	PAXG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.92%	-37.04%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-9.02%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.25%	-23.28%	+4.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.36%	-29.56%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.31%	-3.57%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.34%	-11.15%	+2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	3.18%	-0.46%

Volatility

CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that CPXJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPXJ.L	PAXG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	4.10%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.85%	10.91%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.42%	13.37%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	21.69%	-4.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	26.87%	-8.84%

CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXJ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CPXJ.L vs. PAXG.L - Dividend Comparison

CPXJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CPXJ.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS	0.03%	0.03%	0.06%	0.04%	0.04%	0.04%	0.03%	0.04%	0.04%	0.03%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPXJ.L and PAXG.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, CPXJ.L and PAXG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CPXJ.L or PAXG.L?

On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPXJ.L or PAXG.L?

PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPXJ.L.

What is the main difference between CPXJ.L and PAXG.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPXJ.L and 0.12% for PAXG.L.