CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L
CPXJ.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) and ESPS.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CPXJ.L returned 4.86%/yr vs 4.93%/yr for ESPS.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPXJ.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ESPS.L.
Performance
CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CPXJ.L is traded in USD, while ESPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPXJ.L achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than ESPS.L's 6.31% return.
CPXJ.L
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- 1Y
- 16.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
ESPS.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 13.50%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- —
CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPXJ.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc | 8.57% | 20.05% | 5.35% | 5.87% | -5.98% | 1.97% |
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 6.31% | 18.50% | 5.81% | 7.20% | -8.84% | 4.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPXJ.L and ESPS.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, CPXJ.L and ESPS.L have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.
CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
Financial Services
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Basic Materials
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Industrials
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Real Estate
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Consumer Cyclical
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Utilities
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Healthcare
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Consumer Defensive
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Communication Services
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Energy
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Technology
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L
CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPXJ.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.48 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 4.63 | +1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPXJ.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.03 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.38 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.49 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than ESPS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXJ.L and ESPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPXJ.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.92% | -22.90% | -16.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -9.09% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -19.21% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -22.90% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -4.45% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.34% | -5.60% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.91% | -0.19% |
Volatility
CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) at 3.99%. This indicates that CPXJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPXJ.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 3.99% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 10.41% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 13.03% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 23.66% | -6.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 23.68% | -5.65% |
CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPXJ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPXJ.L nor ESPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CPXJ.L and ESPS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ESPS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESPS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPXJ.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPXJ.L and 0.19% for ESPS.L.
Find the right allocation for CPXJ.L and ESPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer