PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CPXJ.L is traded in USD, while ESPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPXJ.L achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than ESPS.L's 6.31% return.


CPXJ.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
8.57%
6M
10.28%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
7.73%

ESPS.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
6.31%
6M
7.92%
1Y
13.50%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CPXJ.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc
8.57%20.05%5.35%5.87%-5.98%1.97%
ESPS.L
Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
6.31%18.50%5.81%7.20%-8.84%4.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CPXJ.L and ESPS.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.53

Over the past year, CPXJ.L and ESPS.L have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CPXJ.L
ESPS.L

Financial Services

45.5%
50.7%

Basic Materials

15.5%
11.6%

Industrials

8.6%
7.2%

Real Estate

7.9%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
6.8%

Utilities

3.6%
2.2%

Healthcare

3.2%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.6%

Energy

2.8%
3.0%

Technology

1.1%
1.4%

Financial Services

CPXJ.L
45.5%
ESPS.L
50.7%

Basic Materials

CPXJ.L
15.5%
ESPS.L
11.6%

Industrials

CPXJ.L
8.6%
ESPS.L
7.2%

Real Estate

CPXJ.L
7.9%
ESPS.L
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CPXJ.L
6.1%
ESPS.L
6.8%

Utilities

CPXJ.L
3.6%
ESPS.L
2.2%

Healthcare

CPXJ.L
3.2%
ESPS.L
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

CPXJ.L
2.9%
ESPS.L
2.6%

Communication Services

CPXJ.L
2.9%
ESPS.L
2.6%

Energy

CPXJ.L
2.8%
ESPS.L
3.0%

Technology

CPXJ.L
1.1%
ESPS.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPXJ.L
CPXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPS.L
ESPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPXJ.LESPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.48

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

4.63

+1.30

CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXJ.L and ESPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPXJ.LESPS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.03

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.38

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.49

-0.16

Drawdowns

CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than ESPS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXJ.L and ESPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPXJ.LESPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.92%

-22.90%

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-9.09%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.25%

-19.21%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-22.90%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-4.45%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-5.60%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.91%

-0.19%

Volatility

CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) at 3.99%. This indicates that CPXJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPXJ.LESPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

3.99%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

10.41%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

13.03%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

23.66%

-6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

23.68%

-5.65%

CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXJ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CPXJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPXJ.L nor ESPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, CPXJ.L and ESPS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ESPS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESPS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPXJ.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPXJ.L and 0.19% for ESPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPXJ.L and ESPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer