CPSF vs. CBOJ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CPSF (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February) and CBOJ (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from Calamos. CPSF is actively managed, while CBOJ is passively managed. Over the past year, CPSF returned 6.83% vs -5.58% for CBOJ. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CPSF vs. CBOJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February (CPSF) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSF achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly higher than CBOJ's -1.54% return.

CPSF

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: 2.34%
• YTD: 3.13%
• 1Y: 6.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.23%

CBOJ

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: -0.55%
• YTD: -1.54%
• 1Y: -5.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	$91.16K	$69.82K	$86.34K
CPSF Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February	$35.38K	$32.23K	$45.55K

CPSF vs. CBOJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPSF Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February	3.13%	6.14%
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-1.54%	-0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CPSF and CBOJ is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

CPSF vs. CBOJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPSF

CPSF Risk / Return Rank: 96
CPSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CPSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CPSF Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CPSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CPSF Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CBOJ

CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPSF vs. CBOJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February (CPSF) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPSF	CBOJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.27	-1.18	+4.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.13	-1.58	+6.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	0.82	+0.87
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.28	-0.66	+5.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.30	-0.94	+26.24

CPSF vs. CBOJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSF Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is higher than the CBOJ Sharpe Ratio of -1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSF and CBOJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPSF vs. CBOJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSF drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum CBOJ drawdown of -8.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSF and CBOJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPSF	CBOJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.89%	-8.44%	+5.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.30%	-8.44%	+7.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.86%	+7.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.33%	-3.64%	+3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.27%	5.97%	-5.70%

Volatility

CPSF vs. CBOJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February (CPSF) is 0.55%, while Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) has a volatility of 0.71%. This indicates that CPSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBOJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPSF	CBOJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	0.71%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.54%	2.32%	-0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10%	4.75%	-2.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.74%	4.40%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.74%	4.40%	-1.66%

CPSF vs. CBOJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CPSF and CBOJ have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CPSF vs. CBOJ - Dividend Comparison

CPSF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	3.20%	3.16%
CPSF Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPSF and CBOJ in my portfolio?

CPSF and CBOJ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPSF or CBOJ?

CBOJ has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to CPSF (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSF dropped -2.89% vs CBOJ's -8.44%.

Which ETF is better, CPSF or CBOJ?

On 1-year performance, CPSF leads with 6.83% vs -5.58% for CBOJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CPSF has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPSF or CBOJ?

Over the 1-year period, CPSF has performed better with a 6.83% return vs -5.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPSF or CBOJ?

CPSF and CBOJ have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPSF or CBOJ?

CBOJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.00% for CPSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.