CPSF vs. PBOG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CPSF (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPSF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while PBOG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. CPSF is actively managed, while PBOG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. CPSF charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.

Performance

CPSF vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February (CPSF) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSF achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 20.33% return.

CPSF

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 2.25%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 7.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBOG

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -9.73%
• YTD: 20.33%
• 6M: 21.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSF vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPSF Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February	2.25%	1.16%
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF	20.33%	1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CPSF and PBOG is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	-0.29

Return for Risk

CPSF vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSF

CPSF Risk / Return Rank: 95
CPSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CPSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CPSF Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CPSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CPSF Martin Ratio Rank: 95

PBOG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSF vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February (CPSF) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPSF	PBOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.30	—	—

Drawdowns

CPSF vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSF drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum PBOG drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSF and PBOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPSF	PBOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.89%	-16.46%	+13.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-15.19%	+14.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-3.86%	+3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CPSF	PBOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.48%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12%	23.95%	-21.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.81%	23.95%	-21.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.81%	23.95%	-21.14%

CPSF vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSF has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPSF vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison

CPSF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

Position	TTM	2025
CPSF Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF	0.14%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPSF and PBOG in my portfolio?

CPSF and PBOG have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CPSF or PBOG?

On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPSF or PBOG?

PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPSF or PBOG?

PBOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for CPSF.

What is the main difference between CPSF and PBOG?

CPSF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PBOG is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPSF and 0.13% for PBOG.