CPSD vs. SPLV
CPSD (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — CPSD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. CPSD is actively managed, while SPLV is passively managed. Over the past year, CPSD returned 10.93% vs 5.78% for SPLV. At 0.29, their price movements are largely independent. CPSD charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLV.
Performance
CPSD vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPSD achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than SPLV's 5.14% return.
CPSD
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- 10.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- 5.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
CPSD vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December | 1.36% | 7.63% | 0.04% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 5.14% | 4.10% | -5.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPSD and SPLV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPSD vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank
CPSD
SPLV
CPSD vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPSD | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.60 | 0.58 | +3.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.81 | 0.88 | +4.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.10 | +0.67 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.06 | 0.86 | +6.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.82 | 2.25 | +31.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPSD | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60 | 0.58 | +3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.88 | 0.70 | +1.17 |
Drawdowns
CPSD vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPSD drawdown since its inception was -3.45%, smaller than the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSD and SPLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPSD | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -36.26% | +32.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.49% | -6.64% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.40% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -3.54% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 2.53% | -2.22% |
Volatility
CPSD vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) is 1.03%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that CPSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPSD | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 2.77% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.96% | 6.89% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 10.13% | -7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 12.42% | -8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 15.35% | -11.81% |
CPSD vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPSD has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPSD vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison
CPSD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.08% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |