PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPSD vs. PAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPSD vs. PAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSD achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than PAPR's 5.85% return.


CPSD

1D
0.25%
1M
1.47%
YTD
1.36%
6M
3.29%
1Y
10.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAPR

1D
0.63%
1M
4.81%
YTD
5.85%
6M
7.98%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
11.80%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSD vs. PAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPSD and PAPR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024

0.75

The correlation between CPSD and PAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 — a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPSD vs. PAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSD
CPSD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CPSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PAPR
PAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSD vs. PAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPSDPAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.60

4.42

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.81

8.17

-2.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

2.31

-0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.06

13.69

-6.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

33.82

78.44

-44.62

CPSD vs. PAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is comparable to the PAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSD and PAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPSDPAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60

4.42

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.88

0.82

+1.06

Drawdowns

CPSD vs. PAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSD drawdown since its inception was -3.45%, smaller than the maximum PAPR drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSD and PAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSDPAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-15.31%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-1.36%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-1.60%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

0.24%

+0.07%

Volatility

CPSD vs. PAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) is 1.03%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that CPSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CPSDPAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

1.57%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.96%

2.48%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

4.57%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.54%

8.25%

-4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.54%

9.52%

-5.98%

CPSD vs. PAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSD has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than PAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPSD vs. PAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPSD nor PAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
CPSD
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.07%