CPSD vs. PAPR
CPSD (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December) and PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. CPSD is actively managed, while PAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, CPSD returned 10.93% vs 20.03% for PAPR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPSD charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PAPR.
Performance
CPSD vs. PAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPSD achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than PAPR's 5.85% return.
CPSD
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- 10.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 20.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- —
CPSD vs. PAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December | 1.36% | 7.63% | 0.04% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 5.85% | 6.58% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPSD and PAPR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024 | 0.75 |
The correlation between CPSD and PAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPSD vs. PAPR — Risk / Return Rank
CPSD
PAPR
CPSD vs. PAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPSD | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.60 | 4.42 | -0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.81 | 8.17 | -2.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 2.31 | -0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.06 | 13.69 | -6.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.82 | 78.44 | -44.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPSD | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60 | 4.42 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.88 | 0.82 | +1.06 |
Drawdowns
CPSD vs. PAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPSD drawdown since its inception was -3.45%, smaller than the maximum PAPR drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSD and PAPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPSD | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -15.31% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.49% | -1.36% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -1.60% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.24% | +0.07% |
Volatility
CPSD vs. PAPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) is 1.03%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that CPSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPSD | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 1.57% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.96% | 2.48% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 4.57% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 8.25% | -4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 9.52% | -5.98% |
CPSD vs. PAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPSD has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than PAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPSD vs. PAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPSD nor PAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% |