PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPSA vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPSA vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSA achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.


CPSA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.81%
6M
3.15%
1Y
8.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSA vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CPSA
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August
2.81%7.39%3.51%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
103.67%-8.46%-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CPSA and USO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024

-0.08

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CPSA and USO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.08 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPSA vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSA
CPSA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CPSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSA Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSA vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPSAUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.38

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

5.01

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.36

9.42

+21.94

CPSA vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSA Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSA and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPSAUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53

2.31

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.84

-0.18

+2.01

Drawdowns

CPSA vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSA drawdown since its inception was -4.72%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSA and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSAUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-98.19%

+93.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-20.39%

+18.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-85.01%

+85.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-75.30%

+74.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

10.82%

-10.56%

Volatility

CPSA vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA) is 0.41%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that CPSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPSAUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

14.87%

-14.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.73%

38.23%

-36.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33%

44.20%

-41.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.14%

36.06%

-31.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

39.00%

-34.86%

CPSA vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPSA vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPSA nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CPSA and USO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to CPSA (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSA dropped -4.72% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 1-year performance, USO leads with 101.55% vs 8.10% for CPSA. On fees, CPSA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSA has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USO has performed better with a 101.55% return vs 8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPSA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

CPSA and USO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CPSA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USO is Oil & Gas. CPSA tracks MerQube Cap Protect US Lrg Cap PR Index - Aug, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPSA and 0.86% for USO.

CPSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPSA and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer