PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPODX vs. CAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPODX vs. CAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Insight Fund (CPODX) and Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund (CAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPODX achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than CAF's 15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CPODX has outperformed CAF with an annualized return of 16.81%, while CAF has yielded a comparatively lower 6.32% annualized return.


CPODX

1D
-1.76%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-3.24%
6M
-7.29%
1Y
2.24%
3Y*
25.64%
5Y*
-3.01%
10Y*
16.81%

CAF

1D
-1.18%
1M
1.72%
YTD
15.73%
6M
15.66%
1Y
50.70%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
6.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPODX vs. CAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPODX
Morgan Stanley Insight Fund
-3.24%19.23%46.73%53.03%-60.99%-6.54%116.44%33.45%12.29%48.76%
CAF
Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund
15.73%41.51%0.34%-9.39%-30.41%-1.77%12.74%23.50%-14.26%44.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CPODX and CAF is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2006

0.40

The correlation between CPODX and CAF shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPODX vs. CAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPODX
CPODX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CPODX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPODX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPODX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CPODX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPODX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CAF
CAF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAF Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAF Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPODX vs. CAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Insight Fund (CPODX) and Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund (CAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPODXCAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.47

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

4.64

-4.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

14.10

-13.76

CPODX vs. CAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPODX Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the CAF Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPODX and CAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPODX vs. CAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPODX drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, which is greater than CAF's maximum drawdown of -65.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPODX and CAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPODXCAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.51%

-65.88%

-18.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.28%

-10.98%

-17.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.37%

-26.27%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.71%

-46.98%

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.26%

-49.01%

-22.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.47%

-5.20%

-17.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.42%

-25.86%

-12.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.49%

3.61%

+9.88%

Volatility

CPODX vs. CAF - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Insight Fund (CPODX) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund (CAF) at 5.89%. This indicates that CPODX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPODXCAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.71%

5.89%

+4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.89%

13.78%

+9.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.03%

19.03%

+11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.92%

21.57%

+18.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.21%

21.88%

+12.33%

CPODX vs. CAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPODX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than CAF's 1.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPODX vs. CAF - Dividend Comparison

CPODX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAF
Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund
1.31%1.51%2.63%0.96%0.02%6.57%10.40%3.78%9.48%5.20%4.69%67.03%
CPODX
Morgan Stanley Insight Fund
0.00%0.00%0.64%0.00%41.78%12.90%7.97%6.49%8.40%26.14%9.16%8.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPODX and CAF have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPODX has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to CAF (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPODX dropped -84.51% vs CAF's -65.88%.

CAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPODX and CAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer