PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPODX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CPODX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Insight Fund (CPODX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CPODX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPODX
Morgan Stanley Insight Fund
-13.67%19.23%46.73%53.03%-60.99%-6.54%116.44%33.45%12.29%48.76%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
-7.12%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%36.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPODX achieves a -13.67% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's -7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CPODX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 15.35%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.08% annualized return.


CPODX

1D
4.72%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
-13.67%
6M
-22.53%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
24.77%
5Y*
-3.71%
10Y*
15.35%

FBGRX

1D
4.54%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
-7.12%
6M
-4.04%
1Y
26.78%
3Y*
26.54%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
19.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CPODX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPODX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CPODX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPODX
CPODX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CPODX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPODX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPODX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CPODX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPODX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPODX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Insight Fund (CPODX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPODXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

1.13

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.87

1.73

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

2.00

-1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.18

7.92

-6.74

CPODX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPODX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPODX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPODXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.13

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.47

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.81

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.65

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between CPODX and FBGRX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CPODX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

CPODX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPODX
Morgan Stanley Insight Fund
0.00%0.00%0.64%0.00%41.78%12.90%7.97%6.49%8.40%26.14%9.16%8.38%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
2.05%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%

Drawdowns

CPODX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPODX drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPODX and FBGRX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CPODXFBGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.51%

-58.64%

-25.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.28%

-13.89%

-14.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.71%

-43.08%

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.26%

-43.08%

-28.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.82%

-8.68%

-22.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.54%

-12.58%

-25.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.04%

3.51%

+7.53%

Volatility

CPODX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Insight Fund (CPODX) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 7.83%. This indicates that CPODX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CPODXFBGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.11%

7.83%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.91%

14.08%

+8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.55%

24.98%

+8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.87%

24.93%

+14.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.91%

23.63%

+10.28%