PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPOAX vs. MSEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPOAX vs. MSEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Insight A (CPOAX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPOAX achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than MSEQX's -1.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CPOAX having a 17.14% annualized return and MSEQX not far ahead at 17.37%.


CPOAX

1D
-1.26%
1M
6.92%
YTD
4.60%
6M
1.21%
1Y
13.31%
3Y*
29.62%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
17.14%

MSEQX

1D
-1.57%
1M
4.10%
YTD
-1.20%
6M
-2.94%
1Y
9.09%
3Y*
29.17%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
17.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPOAX vs. MSEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPOAX
Morgan Stanley Insight A
4.60%18.91%46.35%52.72%-61.02%-6.83%115.86%33.08%11.94%48.40%
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
-1.20%24.78%46.65%50.36%-60.18%-0.00%115.60%38.25%5.38%43.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CPOAX and MSEQX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 1997

0.94

The correlation between CPOAX and MSEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPOAX vs. MSEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPOAX
CPOAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CPOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
CPOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MSEQX
MSEQX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MSEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPOAX vs. MSEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Insight A (CPOAX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPOAXMSEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.08

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

0.35

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

0.76

+0.32

CPOAX vs. MSEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPOAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the MSEQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPOAX and MSEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPOAXMSEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

0.35

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.05

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.52

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.47

-0.13

Drawdowns

CPOAX vs. MSEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPOAX drawdown since its inception was -84.57%, which is greater than MSEQX's maximum drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPOAX and MSEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPOAXMSEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.57%

-69.48%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.37%

-27.73%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.38%

-32.52%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.73%

-69.48%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.33%

-69.48%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.08%

-13.64%

-3.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.22%

-16.89%

-22.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.13%

12.82%

+0.31%

Volatility

CPOAX vs. MSEQX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Insight A (CPOAX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) have volatilities of 8.49% and 8.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPOAXMSEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.49%

8.13%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.71%

21.32%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.66%

27.99%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.75%

39.71%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.08%

33.76%

+0.32%

CPOAX vs. MSEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPOAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MSEQX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPOAX vs. MSEQX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPOAX nor MSEQX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPOAX
Morgan Stanley Insight A
0.00%0.00%0.61%0.00%51.84%14.94%9.06%7.29%9.33%28.73%9.83%8.92%
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
0.00%0.00%0.55%0.05%16.79%24.24%9.36%21.39%5.38%21.18%12.71%7.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, CPOAX and MSEQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CPOAX has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to MSEQX (8.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPOAX dropped -84.57% vs MSEQX's -69.48%.

CPOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPOAX and MSEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer