QEW vs. BALQ
QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) and BALQ (iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QEW is passively managed, while BALQ is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QEW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BALQ.
Performance
QEW vs. BALQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QEW
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BALQ
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 18.59%
- 6M
- 17.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QEW vs. BALQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 17.75% |
BALQ iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF | 19.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between QEW and BALQ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QEW vs. BALQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF (BALQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QEW vs. BALQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -5.87%, smaller than the maximum BALQ drawdown of -11.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and BALQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QEW | BALQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -11.79% | +5.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.04% | -3.71% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.11% | -2.40% | +1.29% |
Volatility
QEW vs. BALQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QEW | BALQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 20.62% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 20.62% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 20.62% | -0.23% |
QEW vs. BALQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BALQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QEW vs. BALQ - Dividend Comparison
QEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than BALQ's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BALQ iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF | 4.76% | 0.95% |
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, QEW and BALQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BALQ.
BALQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 0.11% for QEW.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QEW and 0.35% for BALQ.
Find the right allocation for QEW and BALQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer