CPNG vs. SIL
CPNG (Coupang, Inc.) is a stock, while SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Over the past 5 years, CPNG returned -15.31%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for SIL. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CPNG vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPNG achieves a -28.70% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's -2.20% return.
CPNG
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- -28.70%
- 6M
- -34.37%
- 1Y
- -40.14%
- 3Y*
- 0.44%
- 5Y*
- -15.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SIL
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -10.83%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 69.43%
- 3Y*
- 46.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
CPNG vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPNG Coupang, Inc. | -28.70% | 7.32% | 35.76% | 10.06% | -49.93% | -53.73% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -2.20% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPNG and SIL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2021 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPNG vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
CPNG
SIL
CPNG vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coupang, Inc. (CPNG) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPNG | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.25 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.91 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 5.09 | -6.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPNG vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPNG drawdown since its inception was -85.28%, roughly equal to the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPNG and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPNG | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.28% | -82.99% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.91% | -37.08% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.91% | -37.08% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.01% | -52.77% | -26.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.51% | -30.80% | -42.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.19% | -51.40% | -12.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.85% | 13.90% | +16.95% |
Volatility
CPNG vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
Coupang, Inc. (CPNG) has a higher volatility of 21.03% compared to Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) at 19.29%. This indicates that CPNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPNG | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.03% | 19.29% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.57% | 43.57% | -4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.14% | 51.69% | -7.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.50% | 39.64% | +12.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.74% | 39.81% | +13.93% |
Dividends
CPNG vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
CPNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPNG Coupang, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.21% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPNG and SIL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPNG has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to SIL (19.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPNG dropped -85.28% vs SIL's -82.99%.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPNG and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer