PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPMPX vs. JGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPMPX vs. JGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Changing Parameters Fund (CPMPX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPMPX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than JGH's 5.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CPMPX has underperformed JGH with an annualized return of 4.05%, while JGH has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return.


CPMPX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.28%
6M
0.47%
YTD
0.85%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
4.05%
ALL TIME*
3.40%

JGH

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.13%
6M
1.68%
YTD
5.11%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
7.61%
ALL TIME*
6.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$971.44K$1.41M$1.21M

CPMPX vs. JGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPMPX
Changing Parameters Fund
0.85%6.65%-3.47%8.13%-0.22%3.86%13.43%6.82%-1.19%5.29%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
5.11%8.62%15.98%20.89%-21.01%10.84%2.77%30.04%-12.02%15.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CPMPX and JGH is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2014

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPMPX vs. JGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPMPX
CPMPX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CPMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CPMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

JGH
JGH Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
JGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGH Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
JGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGH Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPMPX vs. JGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Changing Parameters Fund (CPMPX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPMPXJGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.10

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

0.57

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

1.35

+6.45

CPMPX vs. JGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the JGH Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPMPX and JGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPMPX vs. JGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPMPX drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, smaller than the maximum JGH drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPMPX and JGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPMPXJGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-43.79%

+34.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-8.37%

+7.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.13%

-13.70%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.13%

-28.66%

+20.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.13%

-43.79%

+35.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-2.07%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-6.93%

+5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

3.52%

-3.04%

Volatility

CPMPX vs. JGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Changing Parameters Fund (CPMPX) is 0.48%, while Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that CPMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPMPXJGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

2.52%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.32%

7.61%

-6.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85%

10.44%

-8.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.84%

13.78%

-9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.11%

15.87%

-12.76%

CPMPX vs. JGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPMPX has a 2.90% expense ratio, which is higher than JGH's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPMPX vs. JGH - Dividend Comparison

CPMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than JGH's 9.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPMPX
Changing Parameters Fund
3.80%3.83%0.00%4.26%5.03%4.24%6.94%2.85%1.71%3.32%2.25%1.51%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
9.91%9.82%9.67%10.18%12.05%8.19%7.13%7.53%9.88%8.52%9.61%11.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPMPX and JGH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGH has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to CPMPX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPMPX dropped -8.87% vs JGH's -43.79%.

CPMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPMPX and JGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer