PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPMPX vs. BSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPMPX vs. BSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Changing Parameters Fund (CPMPX) and Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPMPX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than BSL's -1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CPMPX has underperformed BSL with an annualized return of 4.18%, while BSL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.84% annualized return.


CPMPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.17%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
4.18%

BSL

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-1.37%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
-0.75%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
5.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPMPX vs. BSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPMPX
Changing Parameters Fund
0.85%6.65%-3.47%8.13%-0.22%3.86%13.43%6.82%-1.19%5.29%
BSL
Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund
-1.37%2.15%18.16%20.03%-22.88%28.33%-4.44%14.06%-7.52%5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CPMPX and BSL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPMPX vs. BSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPMPX
CPMPX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CPMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CPMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BSL
BSL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPMPX vs. BSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Changing Parameters Fund (CPMPX) and Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPMPXBSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.26

-0.11

+3.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.97

-0.11

+5.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

0.99

+0.81

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

-0.04

+4.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.81

-0.10

+12.92

CPMPX vs. BSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPMPX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the BSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPMPX and BSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPMPXBSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

-0.11

+3.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.36

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.35

0.36

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.31

+0.79

Drawdowns

CPMPX vs. BSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPMPX drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, smaller than the maximum BSL drawdown of -43.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPMPX and BSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPMPXBSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-43.83%

+34.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-7.86%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.13%

-7.86%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.13%

-24.48%

+16.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.13%

-43.83%

+35.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-3.79%

+2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-7.36%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

3.22%

-2.76%

Volatility

CPMPX vs. BSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Changing Parameters Fund (CPMPX) is 0.51%, while Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that CPMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPMPXBSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

1.27%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.29%

5.22%

-3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80%

6.64%

-4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.83%

10.52%

-6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.11%

16.41%

-13.30%

CPMPX vs. BSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPMPX has a 2.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BSL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPMPX vs. BSL - Dividend Comparison

CPMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than BSL's 8.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSL
Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund
8.40%8.45%9.46%10.76%6.89%5.75%7.65%8.15%9.21%5.93%5.86%7.27%
CPMPX
Changing Parameters Fund
3.80%3.83%0.00%4.26%5.03%4.24%6.94%2.85%1.71%3.32%2.25%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPMPX and BSL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSL has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to CPMPX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPMPX dropped -8.87% vs BSL's -43.83%.

CPMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPMPX and BSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer