PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPLS vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPLS vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPLS achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 6.99% return.


CPLS

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.48%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.03%
1M
4.27%
YTD
6.99%
6M
8.81%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
12.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPLS vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CPLS
AB Core Plus Bond ETF
0.53%6.91%1.65%1.21%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
6.99%9.04%35.41%-2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CPLS and YCS is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023

-0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPLS vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPLS
CPLS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPLS vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPLSYCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

2.05

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

2.59

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.95

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.52

12.35

-5.82

CPLS vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPLS and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPLSYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.05

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.33

+0.54

Drawdowns

CPLS vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLS and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPLSYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-49.56%

+45.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-8.30%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.04%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-19.94%

+18.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

2.66%

-1.88%

Volatility

CPLS vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) is 1.42%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that CPLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPLSYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

2.75%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

12.36%

-9.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

17.38%

-13.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

21.11%

-16.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

19.02%

-14.20%

CPLS vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPLS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPLS vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

CPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CPLS
AB Core Plus Bond ETF
4.61%4.66%4.71%0.23%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPLS and YCS have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to CPLS (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPLS dropped -4.43% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 35.19% vs 5.29% for CPLS. On fees, CPLS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CPLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 35.19% return vs 5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPLS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

CPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

CPLS is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CPLS and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPLS and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer