CPLS vs. CRXP
CPLS (AB Core Plus Bond ETF) and CRXP (Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CPLS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for CRXP.
Performance
CPLS vs. CRXP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPLS achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than CRXP's -0.10% return.
CPLS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 1.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.77%
CRXP
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $270.39K | $481.99K | $439.72K | |
| $4.49K | $319.92K | $113.61K |
CPLS vs. CRXP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.70% | -0.01% |
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.10% | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPLS and CRXP is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPLS vs. CRXP — Risk / Return Rank
CPLS
CRXP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CPLS vs. CRXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) and Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPLS | CRXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPLS vs. CRXP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, which is greater than CRXP's maximum drawdown of -2.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLS and CRXP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPLS | CRXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -2.80% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -2.22% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -1.04% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
CPLS vs. CRXP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPLS | CRXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81% | 3.76% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.80% | 3.76% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.80% | 3.76% | +1.04% |
CPLS vs. CRXP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPLS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than CRXP's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPLS vs. CRXP - Dividend Comparison
CPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than CRXP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.33% | 4.66% | 4.71% | 0.23% |
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | 2.53% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPLS and CRXP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRXP is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRXP is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CPLS.
CPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 2.53% for CRXP.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Columbia. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CPLS and 0.22% for CRXP.
Find the right allocation for CPLS and CRXP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer