PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPLB vs. IUSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPLB vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPLB achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than IUSB's -0.29% return.


CPLB

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.01%
6M
-0.25%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
2.84%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.66%

IUSB

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.11%
6M
-0.52%
YTD
-0.29%
1Y
2.26%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
1.70%
ALL TIME*
2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.63M$2.45M$1.64M
$142.04M$149.14M$266.40M

CPLB vs. IUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CPLB
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF
0.10%7.76%4.19%7.16%-14.44%0.35%
IUSB
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
-0.29%7.38%2.11%6.23%-13.04%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CPLB and IUSB is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021

0.87

The correlation between CPLB and IUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPLB vs. IUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPLB
CPLB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CPLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CPLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSB
IUSB Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPLB vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPLBIUSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.22

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

3.12

+0.59

CPLB vs. IUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the IUSB Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPLB and IUSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPLB vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPLB drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than IUSB's maximum drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLB and IUSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPLBIUSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-17.90%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-2.53%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-4.81%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.92%

-17.87%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-2.03%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-3.56%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.98%

-0.03%

Volatility

CPLB vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) is 0.81%, while iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that CPLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPLBIUSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.92%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

2.82%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

3.55%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

5.80%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

5.04%

-0.05%

CPLB vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPLB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPLB vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison

CPLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, more than IUSB's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPLB
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF
5.54%5.46%5.40%4.82%3.17%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSB
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
3.92%4.17%4.04%3.46%2.53%1.74%2.68%3.04%2.98%2.56%2.60%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPLB and IUSB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSB has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to CPLB (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPLB dropped -18.96% vs IUSB's -17.90%.

On 5-year performance, CPLB leads with 0.42% vs -0.01% for IUSB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, CPLB has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CPLB has performed better with a 0.42% return vs -0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CPLB.

CPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 3.92% for IUSB.

They also come from different issuers: NYLI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CPLB and 0.06% for IUSB.

CPLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPLB and IUSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer