PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPLB vs. HCRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPLB vs. HCRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) and Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPLB achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than HCRB's -0.61% return.


CPLB

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.01%
6M
-0.25%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
2.84%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.66%

HCRB

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.27%
6M
-1.00%
YTD
-0.61%
1Y
1.92%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.63M$2.45M$1.64M
$906.80K$757.94K$1.28M

CPLB vs. HCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CPLB
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF
0.10%7.76%4.19%7.16%-14.44%0.35%
HCRB
Hartford Core Bond ETF
-0.61%7.06%2.23%6.98%-14.61%-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CPLB and HCRB is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021

0.87

The correlation between CPLB and HCRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPLB vs. HCRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPLB
CPLB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CPLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CPLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

HCRB
HCRB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPLB vs. HCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) and Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPLBHCRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.00

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

2.50

+1.20

CPLB vs. HCRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the HCRB Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPLB and HCRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPLB vs. HCRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPLB drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, roughly equal to the maximum HCRB drawdown of -19.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLB and HCRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPLBHCRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-19.90%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-2.82%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-5.17%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.92%

-19.40%

+0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-2.63%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-6.89%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.12%

-0.17%

Volatility

CPLB vs. HCRB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) is 0.81%, while Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that CPLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPLBHCRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

1.14%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

2.98%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

3.77%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

6.13%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

5.91%

-0.92%

CPLB vs. HCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPLB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HCRB's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPLB vs. HCRB - Dividend Comparison

CPLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, more than HCRB's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CPLB
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF
5.54%5.46%5.40%4.82%3.17%0.95%0.00%
HCRB
Hartford Core Bond ETF
4.28%4.12%4.15%3.39%2.18%1.47%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CPLB and HCRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HCRB has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to CPLB (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPLB dropped -18.96% vs HCRB's -19.90%.

On 5-year performance, CPLB leads with 0.42% vs -0.36% for HCRB. On fees, HCRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CPLB has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CPLB has performed better with a 0.42% return vs -0.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HCRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CPLB.

CPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 4.28% for HCRB.

CPLB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while HCRB is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: NYLI and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CPLB and 0.29% for HCRB.

CPLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPLB and HCRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer