CPLB vs. ARTY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CPLB (NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF) and ARTY (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPLB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by NYLI, while ARTY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index. CPLB is actively managed, while ARTY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CPLB returned 5.53%/yr vs 36.96%/yr for ARTY. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CPLB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ARTY.

Performance

CPLB vs. ARTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPLB achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than ARTY's 67.60% return.

CPLB

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 5.72%
• 3Y*: 5.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARTY

• 1D: 3.46%
• 1M: 28.54%
• YTD: 67.60%
• 6M: 67.46%
• 1Y: 117.66%
• 3Y*: 36.96%
• 5Y*: 14.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPLB vs. ARTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CPLB NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF	0.81%	7.76%	4.19%	7.16%	-14.44%	0.38%
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	67.60%	29.97%	8.02%	36.37%	-37.89%	-6.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CPLB and ARTY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.19

CPLB vs. ARTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CPLB	ARTY
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.6%
Industrials	-	5.3%
Real Estate	-	1.2%
Technology	-	87.7%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

CPLB vs. ARTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPLB

CPLB Risk / Return Rank: 43
CPLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CPLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CPLB Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CPLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CPLB Martin Ratio Rank: 41

ARTY

ARTY Risk / Return Rank: 92
ARTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ARTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ARTY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ARTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ARTY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPLB vs. ARTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPLB	ARTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	3.96	-2.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	4.26	-2.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.57	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	6.34	-4.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.64	22.08	-15.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPLB vs. ARTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPLB Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the ARTY Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPLB and ARTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPLB	ARTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	3.96	-2.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.64	-0.47

Drawdowns

CPLB vs. ARTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPLB drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum ARTY drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLB and ARTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPLB	ARTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.96%	-54.50%	+35.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.60%	-18.81%	+16.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.90%	-32.44%	+26.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	0.00%	-1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.08%	-19.86%	+12.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	5.40%	-4.55%

Volatility

CPLB vs. ARTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) is 1.32%, while iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) has a volatility of 11.82%. This indicates that CPLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPLB	ARTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	11.82%	-10.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	25.09%	-22.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.73%	29.92%	-26.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.04%	28.59%	-23.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.04%	27.75%	-22.71%

CPLB vs. ARTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPLB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ARTY's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPLB vs. ARTY - Dividend Comparison

CPLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, while ARTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.88%	0.75%	2.41%	0.53%	0.69%	0.34%
CPLB NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF	5.49%	5.46%	5.40%	4.82%	3.17%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPLB and ARTY in my portfolio?

CPLB and ARTY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPLB or ARTY?

ARTY has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to CPLB (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPLB dropped -18.96% vs ARTY's -54.50%.

Which ETF is better, CPLB or ARTY?

On 3-year performance, ARTY leads with 36.96% vs 5.53% for CPLB. On fees, CPLB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, CPLB has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPLB or ARTY?

Over the 3-year period, ARTY has performed better with a 36.96% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPLB or ARTY?

CPLB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ARTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPLB or ARTY?

CPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.49%, compared with 0.00% for ARTY.

What is the main difference between CPLB and ARTY?

CPLB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while ARTY is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: NYLI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CPLB and 0.47% for ARTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.