CPIEX vs. QNZIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CPIEX (Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund) and QNZIX (AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - CPIEX is a Long-Short fund managed by Counterpoint Mutual Funds, while QNZIX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by AQR Funds. Over the past 3 years, CPIEX returned 22.25%/yr vs 32.65%/yr for QNZIX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPIEX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for QNZIX.

Performance

CPIEX vs. QNZIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund (CPIEX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPIEX achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly lower than QNZIX's 18.23% return.

CPIEX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 6.12%
• YTD: 11.41%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 16.81%
• 3Y*: 22.25%
• 5Y*: 23.61%
• 10Y*: 8.95%

QNZIX

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 4.17%
• YTD: 18.23%
• 6M: 20.50%
• 1Y: 38.49%
• 3Y*: 32.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPIEX vs. QNZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CPIEX Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund	11.41%	10.21%	37.75%	6.18%	4.93%
QNZIX AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I	18.23%	23.26%	35.22%	23.03%	1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CPIEX and QNZIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022	0.55

The correlation between CPIEX and QNZIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CPIEX vs. QNZIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPIEX

CPIEX Risk / Return Rank: 30
CPIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CPIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CPIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CPIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
CPIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

QNZIX

QNZIX Risk / Return Rank: 95
QNZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
QNZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
QNZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
QNZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
QNZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPIEX vs. QNZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund (CPIEX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPIEX	QNZIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	3.65	-2.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	4.76	-2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.65	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	8.07	-5.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.02	32.68	-24.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPIEX vs. QNZIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the QNZIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPIEX and QNZIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPIEX	QNZIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	3.65	-2.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	2.00	-1.38

Drawdowns

CPIEX vs. QNZIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPIEX drawdown since its inception was -48.20%, which is greater than QNZIX's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPIEX and QNZIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPIEX	QNZIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.20%	-18.35%	-29.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-4.86%	-2.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.30%	-13.51%	+6.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.88%	-2.77%	-7.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	1.20%	+0.90%

Volatility

CPIEX vs. QNZIX - Volatility Comparison

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund (CPIEX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX) at 2.27%. This indicates that CPIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QNZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPIEX	QNZIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	2.27%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.11%	7.15%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.46%	10.80%	+0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.60%	12.04%	+0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.72%	12.04%	+0.68%

CPIEX vs. QNZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPIEX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QNZIX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPIEX vs. QNZIX - Dividend Comparison

CPIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than QNZIX's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPIEX Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund	4.99%	5.56%	2.16%	2.44%	3.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.40%	5.93%
QNZIX AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I	0.90%	1.07%	16.81%	23.32%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPIEX and QNZIX in my portfolio?

CPIEX and QNZIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPIEX or QNZIX?

CPIEX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to QNZIX (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPIEX dropped -48.20% vs QNZIX's -18.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QNZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.