PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPIEX vs. QMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPIEX vs. QMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund (CPIEX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPIEX achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly lower than QMHIX's 13.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CPIEX has outperformed QMHIX with an annualized return of 9.23%, while QMHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.82% annualized return.


CPIEX

1D
-1.74%
1M
1.52%
YTD
10.46%
6M
9.46%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
23.77%
10Y*
9.23%

QMHIX

1D
-1.58%
1M
-2.53%
YTD
13.50%
6M
14.29%
1Y
31.77%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
16.59%
10Y*
4.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPIEX vs. QMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPIEX
Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund
10.46%10.21%37.75%6.18%12.15%54.08%-29.20%-7.69%-3.17%14.15%
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
13.50%19.97%10.78%-0.17%50.14%-2.08%-0.73%1.82%-14.44%-1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CPIEX and QMHIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPIEX vs. QMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPIEX
CPIEX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CPIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CPIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

QMHIX
QMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPIEX vs. QMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund (CPIEX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPIEXQMHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.41

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

6.67

-4.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

19.03

-10.50

CPIEX vs. QMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the QMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPIEX and QMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPIEX vs. QMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPIEX drawdown since its inception was -48.20%, which is greater than QMHIX's maximum drawdown of -39.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPIEX and QMHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPIEXQMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.20%

-39.37%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-4.83%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.30%

-19.06%

+11.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.76%

-19.06%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.20%

-34.54%

-13.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-4.69%

+2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-17.75%

+7.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.69%

+0.40%

Volatility

CPIEX vs. QMHIX - Volatility Comparison

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund (CPIEX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) at 4.25%. This indicates that CPIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPIEXQMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

4.25%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

10.07%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

13.11%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.66%

17.32%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.76%

15.29%

-2.53%

CPIEX vs. QMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPIEX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QMHIX's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPIEX vs. QMHIX - Dividend Comparison

CPIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than QMHIX's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPIEX
Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund
5.04%5.56%2.16%2.44%3.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.40%5.93%0.00%0.00%
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
1.80%2.05%2.31%7.66%9.34%10.96%9.52%4.18%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPIEX and QMHIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPIEX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to QMHIX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPIEX dropped -48.20% vs QMHIX's -39.37%.

QMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPIEX and QMHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer