CPHYX vs. PLTNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal High Yield Fund (CPHYX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX).
CPHYX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Apr 8, 1998. PLTNX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014.
Performance
CPHYX vs. PLTNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CPHYX vs. PLTNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPHYX Principal High Yield Fund | -1.64% | 6.68% | 7.09% | 11.27% | -9.32% | 5.41% | 6.11% | 13.24% | -4.76% | 7.78% |
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | -4.53% | 19.89% | 17.25% | 20.33% | -18.49% | 19.70% | 15.78% | 26.17% | -9.84% | 21.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPHYX achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly higher than PLTNX's -4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CPHYX has underperformed PLTNX with an annualized return of 5.18%, while PLTNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.48% annualized return.
CPHYX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -1.64%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 5.18%
PLTNX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -8.15%
- YTD
- -4.53%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPHYX vs. PLTNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPHYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTNX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CPHYX vs. PLTNX — Risk / Return Rank
CPHYX
PLTNX
CPHYX vs. PLTNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal High Yield Fund (CPHYX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPHYX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.02 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.54 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.22 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.22 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 6.15 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPHYX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.02 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.54 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.67 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.61 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between CPHYX and PLTNX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CPHYX vs. PLTNX - Dividend Comparison
CPHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than PLTNX's 4.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPHYX Principal High Yield Fund | 6.09% | 6.46% | 6.23% | 4.70% | 4.56% | 4.72% | 4.82% | 5.50% | 6.18% | 4.90% | 5.62% | 6.24% |
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | 4.81% | 4.59% | 4.40% | 2.84% | 9.11% | 4.23% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 4.68% | 2.21% | 1.99% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
CPHYX vs. PLTNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPHYX drawdown since its inception was -27.79%, smaller than the maximum PLTNX drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPHYX and PLTNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPHYX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.79% | -32.71% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.42% | -11.90% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.33% | -25.48% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.68% | -32.71% | +12.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -8.66% | +6.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -4.83% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 2.36% | -1.62% |
Volatility
CPHYX vs. PLTNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal High Yield Fund (CPHYX) is 1.25%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that CPHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPHYX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 5.01% | -3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.18% | 9.07% | -6.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 16.20% | -12.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 15.39% | -10.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 15.77% | -10.41% |