CPHY vs. HYHG
CPHY (F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds - CPHY tracks the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index while HYHG tracks the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CPHY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
CPHY vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPHY achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.06% return.
CPHY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.03%
CPHY vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF | 0.06% | 2.31% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.06% | 2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPHY and HYHG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPHY vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
CPHY
HYHG
CPHY vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF (CPHY) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPHY | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.46 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
CPHY vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPHY drawdown since its inception was -2.51%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPHY and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPHY | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -25.71% | +23.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.29% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -3.04% | +2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility
CPHY vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPHY | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60% | 5.56% | -1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 8.15% | -4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 9.15% | -5.55% |
CPHY vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPHY vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
CPHY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.78% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPHY and HYHG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CPHY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CPHY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 0.00% for CPHY.
CPHY tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CPHY and 0.50% for HYHG.
Find the right allocation for CPHY and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer