CPHC vs. BYD
CPHC (Canterbury Park Holding Corporation) and BYD (Boyd Gaming Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — CPHC in Gambling, BYD in Resorts & Casinos. Over the past 10 years, CPHC returned 4.79%/yr vs 16.96%/yr for BYD. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CPHC vs. BYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPHC achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than BYD's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CPHC has underperformed BYD with an annualized return of 4.79%, while BYD has yielded a comparatively higher 16.96% annualized return.
CPHC
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- 6M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- -15.40%
- 3Y*
- -11.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.34%
BYD
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 2.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $105.45M | $89.68M | $88.22M | |
| $25.27K | $30.84K | $31.57K |
CPHC vs. BYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPHC Canterbury Park Holding Corporation | 0.24% | -23.63% | 1.68% | -33.81% | 83.78% | 44.36% | -3.47% | -8.88% | -12.79% | 64.77% |
BYD Boyd Gaming Corporation | 0.26% | 18.61% | 17.13% | 15.99% | -15.74% | 52.77% | 43.35% | 45.51% | -40.25% | 74.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPHC and BYD is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2008 | 0.06 |
The correlation between CPHC and BYD shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CPHC:
$78.80M
BYD:
$6.32B
CPHC:
$0.06
BYD:
$23.36
CPHC:
261.02
BYD:
3.64
CPHC:
1.17
BYD:
0.05
CPHC:
1.31
BYD:
1.61
CPHC:
0.94
BYD:
2.55
CPHC:
$59.94M
BYD:
$4.10B
CPHC:
$33.85M
BYD:
$1.52B
CPHC:
$5.93M
BYD:
$2.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPHC vs. BYD — Risk / Return Rank
CPHC
BYD
CPHC vs. BYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) and Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPHC | BYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 0.09 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 0.20 | -1.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPHC vs. BYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPHC drawdown since its inception was -55.88%, smaller than the maximum BYD drawdown of -94.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPHC and BYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPHC | BYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.88% | -94.49% | +38.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.90% | -12.59% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.75% | -25.58% | -23.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.88% | -34.58% | -21.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.88% | -80.01% | +24.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.67% | -6.79% | -43.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -50.48% | +25.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.44% | 5.63% | +7.81% |
Volatility
CPHC vs. BYD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) is 5.16%, while Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that CPHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPHC | BYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 7.85% | -2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.25% | 20.81% | -5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.06% | 26.27% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.07% | 31.46% | +13.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 43.18% | -0.61% |
Dividends
CPHC vs. BYD - Dividend Comparison
CPHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than BYD's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYD Boyd Gaming Corporation | 0.89% | 0.84% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.11% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CPHC Canterbury Park Holding Corporation | 1.83% | 1.82% | 1.37% | 1.37% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.26% | 2.01% | 1.42% | 3.48% | 2.44% |
Financials
CPHC vs. BYD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canterbury Park Holding Corporation and Boyd Gaming Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CPHC vs. BYD - Profitability Comparison
CPHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canterbury Park Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 7.45M and revenue of 13.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.1%.
BYD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported a gross profit of 429.06M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.5%.
CPHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canterbury Park Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 1.06M and revenue of 13.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.8%.
BYD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported an operating income of 200.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
CPHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canterbury Park Holding Corporation reported a net income of 530.66K and revenue of 13.51M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
BYD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported a net income of 131.23M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPHC and BYD have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYD has higher volatility (7.85%) compared to CPHC (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPHC dropped -55.88% vs BYD's -94.49%.
BYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPHC and BYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer